Agenda and minutes

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Chesters, Fowler, Knight, Tucker and Yabsley.

(Please complete the form provided at the meeting or telephone the Corporate and Community Services Team to prepare a form for your signature before the meeting.  Items must be re-declared when the item is called, and Councillors must leave the room if necessary)

There were no declarations of interests.

Report by Head of Place (attached).

The Committee received the following statement from the Corporate and Community Services Officer:

“Any observations which are made during the course of this site visit by Members of the Planning Committee are limited to those issues identified by the Head of Place in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Committee and the Ward Member of Members of the area where the application site is located, as set out in Part 3, Annexe 2 of the North Devon District constitution.

Such observations are made after viewing the site and on the basis of the limited information available on site.

Any such observations are not, nor should they be taken as an indication that the application is acceptable or unacceptable.  A full presentation and consideration of all the planning issues will be made when the matter was determined by the Planning Committee.”

The Committee considered the reasons for the site inspection as outlined by the Planning Officer (circulated previously), those being:

The Planning Officer briefly outlined the application (circulated previously), advising that this was for a retrospective application for change of use from a dwelling (Use Class C3) to Bed and Breakfast (Use Class C1).  The Planning Officer’s plan showed the floor print of the property and confirmed there had been no external changes to the property.  The carpark used by the property was situated to the west of the property.

The Development Management Officer, Devon County Council, advised the Committee of the objections Development Management Highways had, namely that the increased vehicular movements would be significant, inadequate visibility from and emerging vehicles, gradient of the lane and lack of pedestrian footpath.

In response to a question about ownership and access rights to the carpark the Applicant responded that his property owned five spaces on the far right hand side of the carpark, and highlighted another five spaces allocated for the sole use of the nearby properties.

In response to a question about how many properties accessed Kiln Lane the Ward Member advised the Committee that it was eight.

The Applicant advised the Committee that he advocated to his guests that access to the carpark should be from Kiln Lane while to exit the site onto the A399 visitors should travel east, (a right turn out of the carpark) towards Olive plants that had been positioned to create screening at the front of Lion House.

The Development Management Officer confirmed Kiln Lane was an adopted road.

The Development Management Officer explained to the Committee that the retaining wall created the perception of less space and reduced the visibility accessing and exiting the A399.

The Committee then departed on foot from the carpark and walked up the lane towards the property to observe the exit onto the A399 and noted the visibility.

The Committee then traversed down the lane to the western access from  ...  view the full minutes text for item 23.