Issue - meetings

To consider formulating a response to the White Paper.  Report by Lead Officer Planning Policy (attached).

Link to the White Paper: (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/907647/MHCLG-Planning-Consultation.pdf). 

The Committee considered the questions contained within the Planning for the Future White Paper (circulated previously).

Following consideration of the verbal report by the Lead Officer Planning Policy and Senior Planning Policy Officer, the Committee agreed that the following comments formulate the response to the questions contained in the Planning for the Future White Paper:

Pillar 1

1. What three words do you associate most with the planning system in England? Democratic, under-resourced and contentious.

2(a). Do you get involved with planning decisions in your local area? Yes as local planning authority

2(b). If no, why not?  Not applicable.

3. Our proposals will make it much easier to access plans and contribute your views to planning decisions. How would you like to find out about plans and planning proposals in the future? [Social media / Online news / Newspaper / By post / Other – please specify]  Other – All of these options and to also include library, neighbourhood and newsletter as recognised the importance of digital communications.  However, it was not only about online since traditional media/approaches remained important in North Devon due to the rurality of the area and lack of comprehensive broadband coverage, plus an ageing population.

4. What are your top three priorities for planning in your local area?

[Building homes for young people / building homes for the homeless / Protection of green spaces / The environment, biodiversity and action on climate change / Increasing the affordability of housing / The design of new homes and places / Supporting the high street / Supporting the local economy / More or better local infrastructure / Protection of existing heritage buildings or areas / Other – please specify].   Other – All of the above – they are all important and about delivering sustainable development and place making.  Also include more or better local infrastructure.

5. Do you agree that Local Plans should be simplified in line with our proposals?   No.  The White Paper lacked detailed of how it would operate. Agree that it should be simplified and quicker to produce and welcome certainty it could provide to developers and the local community.  However, there were many unanswered questions due to the lack of detail including:

o   How do we articulate a vision and strategy for the plan?– Focus only on specific development proposals loses important aspect of planning and place making

o   Is the categorisation system over simplified? - Need to be able to differentiate between places and take account of local circumstances.

o   Unclear if can sub-divide the categories and apply different approaches to respond to different needs and context.

o   Should be specific control for growth and which design parameters should need.

o   Concerns regarding the three zones including:

§  Protected areas – how does the council take account of local issues, ambitions, vision, etc. if having to use national policies?

§  Renewal areas – Concerns about areas that would traditionally be subject to overlapping approaches – i.e. town centres that are also conservation areas.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 197