Decision details

Performance and Financial Management Quarter 4 of 2021/22

Decision Maker: Strategy and Resources Committee, Policy Development Committee, Council

Decision status: For Determination

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: No


The Committee considered a report by the Director of Resources and Deputy Chief Executive (circulated previously) regarding the Performance and Financial Management for Quarter 4 of 2021/22.


The Accountancy Services Manager highlighted the following:


·       The revenue budget for 2021/22 was approved at Council on 24th February 2021 at £13,639,000.

·       As at 31 March 2022 it was pleasing to report that the final out turn position was a budget surplus of £604,000 which was an overall movement of £515,000 from the last forecast at quarter 3. The breakdown showing the movements was shown in Appendix A – Variations in the Revenue Budget.

·       The original budget for 2021/22 included a forecast to achieve £225,000 worth of salary vacancy savings. This was exceeded by £99,000 giving an overall actual saving of £324,000.

·       Included within the approved budget the Council factored in a government grant in relation to Covid-19 pressures of £536,710 and also budgeted for £375,000 of additional costs and reduced income, these were already incorporated into Appendix A along with the latest forecast for each service area.

·       The above grant of £536,710 was approved and received and the Council was also anticipating £80,000 re-imbursement for Q1 loss of Sales, Fees and charges, from the continued Government 75% income reimbursement scheme, this had now been revised down to £64,000 and the change incorporated into Appendix A.

·       At the end of 2020/21 the Council placed £375,000 into a Covid Budget management reserve to help mitigate any further adverse variances due to the pandemic in 2021/22, this future protection was still available if required.

·       Members approved in June 2021 to proceed with the acquisition of Green Lanes Shopping Centre; which the Council completed the purchase in November 2021. The purchase of Green Lanes Shopping Centre was a once in a lifetime opportunity to acquire this strategic asset and complement other significant regeneration improvements being delivered within the Barnstaple town centre through the Future High Streets project. The financial modelling demonstrated that revenue income generated from the centre would cover both the repayment of the loan and asset management costs and would return a contribution to the Council which could be used towards mitigating future risks on income volatility, investment back into the centre and the overarching council budget.

·       The financial outturn for the Centre had produced a net return (income less costs) for the 2021/22 year of (£243,600) due to minimal borrowing costs for last financial year as these would start in 2022/23. This was a positive return for the Council for the four and half months ownership in the 2021/22 year. The net return to the Council of (£243,600); of this it is proposed to place £75,000 into an earmarked reserve to protect the council budget and mitigate against any future income volatility that could materialise as the Council moved forwards with the centre and a further £168,600 into an earmarked reserve to fund future asset management initiatives to promote, market and maximise the occupancy of the Centre over the next few years, which the Council anticipated would then have a positive financial return on ongoing revenue streams.

·       This was important for the ongoing financial viability of the Centre, however the team had already made positive steps in filling five of the empty units in the last few months and recent feedback from Knight Frank (Commercial Property Specialists) to the Council stated “As we discussed my involvement with Green Lanes is long standing. Prior to your purchase I have to say that the level of voids within the scheme provided a fairly depressing experience however on my most recent visit the overall feel of the scheme had changed with the recent lettings which have been undertaken both improving occupancy levels but also improving the customer ‘experience’ within the scheme”. This was really positive feedback for the Council and demonstrated their intent to make the Centre a success, both operationally and financially.


·       The movement from Q3 of £515,000 could be attributed to:


Ø   ICT reduced spend £78,000.

Ø   Waste & Recycling reduced spend £110,000.

Ø   Waste and Recycling Sales income £74,000.

Ø   Car parking income £60,000.

Ø   Crematorium contribution £41,000.

Ø   Employee vacancy savings £60,000.

Ø   Borrowing costs – Interest Payable £41,000.

Ø   Other Reduced costs £51,000.


·       As at 31st March 2022 the Collection Fund reserve balance was £5,722,000. This earmarked reserve was created to deal with the timing impacts of the Collection Fund (Business Rates), which ensured the revenue budget was not unduly affected in the year the taxes were collected. Collection Fund deficits/surpluses were reversed out to bring the revenue account back to the budgeted figure for the year; the deficits/surpluses were recovered/distributed in the following financial years. This reserve included an £4,523,000 balance that would be utilised in 2022/23 and 2023/24 to mitigate timing differences of business rate reliefs awarded in 2021/22 that from an accounting perspective impacted over the next two financial years; thus leaving the fund reserve with a residue balance of £1,200,000 protection against future volatility.

·       From the revenue budget surplus of £604,000, it was proposed to set aside the amount into the following earmarked reserves as follows:-


Ø  Repairs Fund £400,000 – to fund capital investment business cases.

Ø  Local Plan £100,000 – to fund the cost of the Local review.

Ø  Budget Management £104,000 – increase fund to help mitigate inflationary pressures in 2022-23 year.


·       At the 31st March 2022 total external borrowing was £3,000,000. The timing of any future borrowing was dependent on how the authority managed its treasury activity and due to current low interest rates and reduced returns on investments it was prudent for the Council to ‘internally borrow’ and use these monies to fund the Capital Programme.

·       Appendix B – Movement in reserves and Balances” detailed the movements to and from earmarked reserves in 2021/22.

·       Full details of the Strategic Contingency Reserve movements and commitments were attached as “Appendix C – Strategic Contingency Reserve”.

·       The 2021/22 Capital Programme was attached as “Appendix D – Capital Programme 2021/22”.

·       Actual spend on the Capital Programme for 2021/22 financial year was £21,753,655. The variance against the budget of £23,805,932 was (£2,052,277); the majority of which would be carried forward into the 2022/23 Capital Programme to fund on-going projects.

·       In order to pay for the £21,753,655 capital investment the Council funded this from £4,370,179 received from external sources in the form of grants and other assistance, £374,395 of internal resources held specifically for capital projects, £278,275 from capital receipts and £16,730,806 borrowing internally and externally.

·       Project under spends of £2,031,062 from 2021/22 year were brought forward to produce a revised Capital Programme for 2022/23 year of £17,864,085.

·       Further variations of £1,655,843 were proposed to the 2022/23 to 2024/25 Capital Programme were detailed on pages 26 and 27 of the report.

·       The Programme of £26,948,994 was funded by Capital Receipts / Borrowing (£11,118,848), External Grants and Contributions (£13,550,785) and Reserves (£2,279,361).

·       The Release of Funds – 2022/23 Capital Programme schemes, were detailed on pages 27 and 28 of the report.

·       Bank interest rate increased twice during the quarter taking the rate from 0.25% in December 2021 to 0.75% in March 2022.

·       The average 7 day LIBID (inter-bank bid rate), the Council’s benchmark rate was -0.07%; the LIBID rate stopped on 31st December 2021. On-going our performance would be compared to the 7 day backward looking SONIA (Sterling Overnight Index Average).

·       The return earned on the Council’s investments was 0.05% (previous 0.16%) 4.5.4. £17,859 investment interest was earned during the financial year. (2021/22 interest receivable budget was £35,000).

·       As at 31st March 2022, the Council had total external borrowing of £3,000,000. Three new PWLB loans were drawn in February 2022 for £2.5m. The Annual Treasury Management Report gives further details.

·       £12,251 interest was paid at an average rate of 1.66% on PWLB loans during the financial year. (2021/22 interest payable budget was £109,000).

·       The major areas of credit income were Council Tax, Business Rates, Housing Benefit overpayment Recoveries and General Debtors.

·       As billing authority, the Council annually raised the bills for Council Tax (£69,000,000) and Business Rates (£32,000,000).

·       Collection rates were controlled through monitoring:


Ø  The level of write offs.

Ø  Levels of previous years’ outstanding debt.

Ø  The level of income collection in the year against the annual sums due to be collected.


·       The council’s budget was based on the assumptions that eventually 97% of sums due would be collected. To ensure this level was achieved, year on year levels of write offs approved were controlled against a ceiling of 3% of annual debt.

·       The outstanding amounts of Council Tax and Business Rates at 31st March 2022 were detailed in the table on page 29 of the report under paragraph 4.6.5.

·       Irrecoverable debts from previous years not exceeding £1,500 could be written off with the authorisation of the Chief Financial Officer. Decisions on whether to write off debts over £1,500 rested with the Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the Leader of the Council. As at 31st March 2022 the amount of accounts written off were detailed in the table on page 29 of the report under paragraph 4.6.6.

·       The monitoring of in year collection carried out against national performance indicators targets sums collected in year as a percentage of the Net Sums due for that year.

·       The majority of the write offs were normally individual bankruptcy and company insolvency and in a number of cases include liabilities for previous years. In these cases we were unable to recover the debt. However, if at a later date a dividend was paid, the money was allocated to the account and the relevant amount written back on.

·       The other main reason for write offs was where the person had gone away (no trace). However, write offs were reviewed and where the Council found the persons contact address the write off was reversed and recovery action continues.

·       The levels of collection forCouncil Tax and Business Rates were detailed on page 30 of the report.

·       Information in relation to the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) was contained within appendix F of the report.


In response to questions from the Committee, the Director of Resources and Deputy Chief Executive advised the following:


·       There was an underlying need to borrow £21m for the Capital Programme over the next two financial years. There were a number of cash balances within the authority that would enable the Council to borrow internally, which was a more cost effective alternative than borrowing from the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) at a time when interest rates had increased.

·       The Council had borrowed against the estimated life of an asset over a period of years.

·       Workforce numbers within the Planning service were increasing as approved by the Committee previously when the budget was set. There was a period of time between departure of any employees and a new employee in post and this was offset by agency costs in the short term.

·       The Council had faced challenges with the recruitment to some posts within the authority, which was why the vacancy savings figures were slightly higher. However, comparatively in terms of recruitment issues, the authority was no different to any other Council.

·       The figures for irrecoverable debts from earlier years were no higher than previous years. The majority of write offs were often individual bankruptcy or businesses that had gone into voluntary administration and with £90m of debt raised each year for Business Rates and Council Tax, the write off figures for the Council were not significant by comparison.

·       The progress of projects within the capital programme varied depending on the circumstances.

·       The recent planning appeal for the site at Yelland, which saw costs awarded against the Council would have a significant impact upon the Council’s reserves as there was no budget set aside to cover any costs. Therefore, the funds would have to be taken from the Budget Management Reserve, which then left the Council with reduced funding as it tries to address inflationary pressures and financial resilience for the current year and 2023/24 onwards.

·       The Chief Executive added that it would be some months before the Council knew the final figure and that once that was known, a report would be submitted to Full Council to discuss the options of how this would be financed.

·       The revenue generated from Green Lanes Shopping Centre balanced out the running costs with the borrowing costs spread over the life of the asset. Any surplus revenue would be put back into a reserve fund to invest back into the Centre and also invest in future Regeneration projects.

·       Officers were currently working on a strategy for the Green Lanes Shopping Centre, which would focus on the short/medium and long term and as part of this work one of the main priorities was to ensure that tenants were found for the remaining vacant units.

·       The Chief Executive explained that the Council’s purchase of Green Lanes underpinned its strategy for Barnstaple and the income generated from the asset would outweigh the borrowing costs. The Council’s strategy at the current time was to make North Devon and Barnstaple vibrate and the revenue generated form Green Lanes was covering the borrowing costs at present.

·       The financial details of the asset for 2021-22 year was set out as a standalone item in section 4.1.8 of the report and detailed the figures very clearly. There was a reserve set aside for Green Lanes to maintain the units and support the asset moving forwards.




(a)  the actions being taken to ensure that performance is at the desired level be noted;


(b)  the contributions to/from earmarked reserves be approved (section 4.2 of the report);


(c)  the movement on the Strategic Contingency Reserve (section 4.3 of the report) be noted;


(d)  funds be released for the capital schemes listed in section 4.4.13 of the report;


(e)  the sections dealing with Treasury Management (section 4.5 of the report), and Debt Management (sections 4.6 and 4.7 of the report) be noted.




(f)    Full Council approve the variations to the Capital Programme 2022/23 to 2024/25 (sections 4.4.8 of the report).




Report author: Tony Rumble

Publication date: 12/07/2022

Date of decision: 04/07/2022

Decided at meeting: 04/07/2022 - Strategy and Resources Committee

Accompanying Documents: