Decision details

Decision details

Harbour wall insurance / Marine package insurance

Decision Maker: Chief Financial Officer

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Decision:

To waive the request for waiver and award the contract to Chaucer Group in relation to Harbour wall insurance / Marine package insurance,
.

Reasons for the decision:

To provide marine insurance, which includes harbour wall cover (1st loss limit), additional marine liabilities cover, removal of wreck and pollution clean-up.

I can also confirm that the contract terms which will be used for this contract will be the insurance policy wording and Insurers Terms of Business Agreement, working alongside the Council’s standard terms and conditions for goods and services or (where relevant) works or, where this is not the case, I have sought the approval of Legal Services to the alternative terms and conditions that I propose to use for this contract.

Alternative options considered:

In accordance with paragraph 12 of the Council’s Contract Procedures Rules, quotations should be obtained from more than one supplier using a request for quotation (RFQ) and the quote evaluated as successful, in compliance with the evaluation criteria in the RFQ, should be accepted. In the alternative officers may consider running an open tender process in accordance with paragraph 13 of the Contract Procedure Rules.

I can confirm that I have sought all relevant procurement advice and consider that it is appropriate that this requirement be waived for the following reason:

Only one compliant quote was returned

NOTIFIABLE BELOW THRESHOLD CONTRACTS



DETAIL
I can confirm that, despite non-compliance with the requirements of paragraph 12.1 of the Contract Procedure Rules the award of this contract to the above supplier will be best value for the Council for the following reason(s):
The Broker, Bishopsgate Insurance, undertook market testing however only one reasonable quote was obtained. This is the summary from approaching the following underwriters:
Markel – Did indicate premium, but way too high at approximately GBP250K
BMM P&T – Declined as out of appetite
TT Club - Declined as out of appetite
AIG - Declined as out of appetite
The outcome was also reviewed by an independent consultant, Abingdon Risk Consulting, who deemed it as cost effective as possible. Without a track record of insurance as being in place, a risk becomes much more difficult to place. Once a track record of cover is in place, it should be much easier to “test” the market, in order to optimise the deal as now proposed.

Quotation 1:
Does the quotation conform to the provided specification? Y
(If no, please provide detail)
Supplier Name: Chaucer Group
Quotation Price: £38,000 +Insurance Premium tax and VAT. This premium can be adjusted based on no claims discount or loss ratios. The premium / cover is for a 12 month period.


Publication date: 01/04/2025

Date of decision: 31/03/2025

Accompanying Documents: