Decision Maker: Head of Place
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
The land is located in the countryside where
the North Devon and Torridge Local Plan (NDTLP), and National
Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) seek to restrict certain forms of
development in the interests of sustainable development. The land
is currently being used for the storage and residential use of two
caravans, non-agricultural vehicles and other items not linked to
an agricultural use.
The change of use of land is controlled and limited to that which
meets local economic and social needs, rural building reuse and use
that is necessarily restricted to a countryside location in
accordance with Policy ST01: Principles of Sustainable Development
and Policy ST07 (4): Spatial Development Strategy for Northern
Devon’s Rural Area of the North Devon and Torridge Local Plan
adopted in October 2018.
The storage of the caravans in this location in the open
countryside and their permanent residential use would not be
justified under Policy ST07 of the NDTLP which seeks to restrict
new development in the countryside to that which requires a rural
location and provides for local, social or economic needs. This
policy is further supported by Policy DM28: Rural Worker
Accommodation of the NDTLP relating to rural workers dwellings and
paragraph 79 of the NPPF. These provide exceptional circumstances
for residential development in the countryside. The residential use
of the caravans is not justified for rural workers accommodation in
regard to Policy DM28 or any of the exceptions contained in
paragraph 79 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
In addition the current use of the land would not appear to fall
within any of the rural economy criteria outlined in policy DM14:
Rural Economy, given that the use does not appear to have strong
links to agriculture.
Whilst the occupant of the caravans works locally and goes back to
Surrey at weekends there is not an ‘essential’ need for
him to reside on the land to look after the domestic animals and
limited livestock, other than for convenience.
The land is accessed from a substandard junction and so the
development would have highway implications. Paragraph 109 of the
National Planning Policy Framework states that applications should
be refused on transport grounds where the residual cumulative
impacts of the development are severe and Policy DM05: Highways
states that all development must ensure safe and well-designed
vehicular access and egress, adequate parking and layouts which
consider the needs and accessibility of al highway users including
cyclists and pedestrians.
The development would result in increased use of the junction onto
the public highway. There is limited visibility from and of
vehicles using the junction. This increased use would result
additional danger to all road users and a loss of amenity along the
designated public right of way. This is contrary to policy DM05 of
the NDTLP.
The use of the land for the storage and residential use of the
caravans, vehicles and other items, not linked to an agricultural
use, nor requiring a rural location, is considered against
strategic policies ST01, ST07, DM14 and DM28 of the NDTLP.
Furthermore it is considered that the change of use that has taken
place would result in severe impacts to the safety of road users
and is in an unsustainable location contrary to Policy DM05:
Highways of the NDTLP and Paragraph 109 of the NPPF.
To issue an Enforcement Notice under Section
171(1)(a) of the Town
The Council considers it is necessary to
remedy the breach of planning control by the removal of the
caravans and all other vehicles and paraphernalia not used in
connection with agriculture and that lesser steps cannot deal with
the issue. There is no functional requirement for the retention and
storage of the caravans on the land insofar as it does not meet any
of the criteria listed under Policies ST07 or DM28. It is also
necessary and in the public interest to take enforcement action
since otherwise the use could become lawful with the passage of
time which as stated above is contrary to long established planning
policies seeking to protect the character of the area.
Publication date: 21/12/2020
Date of decision: 11/11/2019